data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/882e2/882e2b708e6b4f21c25fe2dd6d28e35890927334" alt=""
German-born
director Douglas Sirk, who like many talented directors fled Germany during the
rise of the Nazis to find work in America, created a series of masterful
melodramas in Hollywood. At the time the pictures were considered pure fluff,
dismissed with the derogatory term “Women’s Weepies,” but time has come to show
Sirk’s mastery of film and his preoccupation with women’s issues – and in this
case race – to be prescient. By the time of
Imitation of Life, Sirk had
made some 30 films in Hollywood and in many ways it’s his crowning glory, his
ideas all at a peak of expression. The exaggeratedly melodramatic expression of
the characters – he called it "dramas of swollen emotions" – may
induce a chuckle here and there, but nobody’s laughing at the ideas, or at the
way he sets up the devastating finale of the film.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f957/3f957de1302ed3522c178792a912b1a035b28bd3" alt=""
The film, a
remake of a 1934 film of the same title based on a Fannie Hurst novel, centers
on an ambitious actress, Lora Meredith (played by Lana Turner), and her
daughter Susie (played by Sandra Dee), who take on a black woman named Annie
Johnson (played by Juanita Moore) and her light-skinned daughter Sarah Jane
(played by Susan Kohner) to live in a spare room they have and help around the
house. The first part of the film sees Lora and Annie and their daughters
struggling to make ends meet (and also sets up the conflicts that will play out
in the rest of the film) while the remainder shows the now-successful Lora
Meredith and how her success has not brought happiness or fulfillment to
herself or those around her. But the focus in the second half really shifts to
the conflicts between Annie and her daughter. Sarah Jane finds that her race
puts barriers between her and what she wants but is light-skinned enough to
pass for white and does so whenever she has the opportunity, much to the
chagrin of her mother who repeatedly tells her there’s no reason she should be
ashamed of who she is.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/778d3/778d3055376a40999532719c12fb332ac938bf4a" alt=""
The film is
fully centered on these women. Men play almost no part in the narrative except
at moments of convenience, and it’s reflected in Sirk’s way of having Lora move
in the film – note how often she’s separated from men in the frame, or facing
or moving away from them. And when Lora’s on-again-off-again romantic interest
Steve tries to tell her how she will live her life, he’s definitively rebuked.
Men are there, but for Lora only as means to further her ambitions, and for the
daughters as objects of unattainable desire. It would be a crime to spoil how
things play out in the film, so suffice to say that Annie’s almost-saintly and
long-suffering behavior with her daughter plays into Sirk’s best-ever ending,
and that Lora’s ruthless and selfish ambition and Sarah Jane’s rejection of her
race, hemming her in to only "busboys, cooks, chauffeurs" as
potential romantic objects, combine to give the title more meaning than the
glossy soap opera name it could be perceived as.
Sirk is a
master of composition and he’s abetted here by his frequent collaborator,
cinematographer Russell Metty, creating dazzling Eastman Color (it’s not
Technicolor just because it’s bright!) compositions that owe much to Sirk’s
long-time interest in painting but also to his interest in using the frame to
portray his characters as trapped and hemmed in by their worlds, blocked or
separated from others by the things they’ve acquired. He’s also aided by a
tight, no-nonsense script co-written by Allan Scott, responsible for many of
the best of the Astaire-Rogers films, and certainly someone who knows how to use
words sparingly and precisely. The film’s head-on depiction of race issues in
the heating up time of the Civil Rights movement takes center stage in the
film, making this unique amongst his “Women’s Weepies,” though it takes an
equally strong stance about the women’s independence in the film and ices the
whole cake with the generational conflicts between mothers and daughters.
Juanita Moore and Susan Kohner both received nominations for Best Supporting
Actress (which likely split the vote between these superb performances and gave
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ab8/13ab8818027cb4f3565e4c77bd3aab720d3742ae" alt=""
the Oscar to Shelley Winters for
The Diary of Anne Frank), and the film
was ultimately Sirk’s biggest commercial success. Upon completion of the
shooting, Sirk and his wife returned to Europe and he retired from filmmaking,
living out the rest of his days in Switzerland and seeing belated acclaim for
his brilliance finally come his way in the 1970’s and 1980’s. And while many of
his superb melodramas of the 1950’s are worthwhile views – particularly
All
That Heaven Allows,
Written on the Wind,
Magnificent Obsession,
and
A Time to Love and A Time to Die – this one may well be his finest
achievement. Keep the tissues handy for that ending though.
- Patrick
Brown
No comments:
Post a Comment