Showing posts with label christopher walken. Show all posts
Showing posts with label christopher walken. Show all posts

Monday, September 9, 2019

I’d Love To Turn You On At The Movies #226 - Suicide Kings (1997, dir. Peter O'Fallon)

           The 1990s were a time in cinema when Quentin Tarantino-clone directors ran rampant, particularly clogging up the box office in the late ‘90s on the heels of QT’s Pulp Fiction. It seemed like everyone, with varying degrees of success, made a crime comedy with witty banter spoken between criminals and overly glorified gun violence. Speaking as a fan of the man’s work, this isn’t necessarily a complaint. While there were a significant amount of these copycat films that missed the mark, many of them were excellent and continued to develop this type of cinematic storytelling style initially forged by Tarantino.
            In 1997, longtime television director Peter O’Fallon (Party of Five, thirtysomething, etc.) threw his hat in the ring as a feature filmmaker. The result, Suicide Kings, is a strong debut and an enjoyable action-comedy that works on many levels. To hear Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes tell it, I’m a complete moron who wouldn’t know Citizen Kane from Citizen Ruth, but hear me out here, because I really think that if you like these types of films this one might tickle your fancy.
For one thing, it’s got a phenomenal ensemble cast made up of both established stars and talented young actors who would later become stars. The always amazing Christopher Walken plays retired mob boss Carlo Bartolucci (or Charlie Barrett, as he is now known) who wanders into his regular restaurant and becomes the unlikely victim of a kidnapping by spoiled, rich prep school post-grads Max (Sean Patrick-Flannery), Avery (Henry Thomas) and Brett (Jay Mohr). Charlie is chloroformed and taken to a private mansion where he is duct taped to a chair and held captive. When he comes to, the men, joined by another friend T.K. (Jeremy Sisto), explain to him that Avery’s sister (and Max’s fiancĂ©) Elise (Laura Harris) has been kidnapped and her captors have demanded a $2 million ransom. To show their degree of seriousness, her captors have apparently cut off one of Elise’s fingers. Upon hearing this, Charlie realizes that these men have done the same to him, promising to mirror his condition with Elise’s.
The men go on to explain that even though they don’t suspect Charlie being involved, they do plan to exploit Charlie’s connections and ask him to put up the ransom money. After much resistance, Charlie finally agrees to help them and begins making phone calls. Further adding to the complications of the boys’ plan is the arrival of another of their classmates, Ira (Johnny Galecki), whose father owns the house. Ira is a hilariously neurotic and whiny extrovert who is terrified of what his vacationing father will do if he finds out they’ve been in the house at all, much less with a gangster held hostage and bleeding on the floor. So he spends much of the time nitpicking his friends’ behavior, kissing up to Charlie (so he’ll “go easy on him”), and cleaning up his friends’ messes. While captive, Charlie gets to know each of his captors, eventually pitting them against one another when he learns that the kidnapping may have an “inside player” involved. Meanwhile, Charlie gets in touch with his right-hand man Lono, played by ‘90s outlaw comic Denis Leary, who spends his time roughing up wiseguys and ranting a mile a minute to his partner Mickey (Louis Lombardi) about footwear, golf equipment and his nagging wife. Fans of Leary will no doubt be delighted to learn that he improvised many of his lines during these scenes.
            The plot, though simple, goes through many twists and turns that I don’t want to spoil here so you’ll just have to watch it to see to where it meanders. The dialogue is sharp and fast-paced, adding to the Tarantino-esque style. Walken, as usual, is able to practically carry the entire film with his menacing presence, even though in this movie he is essentially incapacitated the whole time. This film is filled with all the things you want in a comedic crime film. It’s one of those buddy films that is instantly quotable, filled with maybe a bit too much male bravado, but never failing to keep the viewer entertained.
-         Jonathan Eagle

Monday, July 15, 2019

I’d Love To Turn You On At The Movies #222 - Last Man Standing (1996, dir. Walter Hill)


            I went to film school because I really love film. That may seem like an obvious statement, but you might be surprised at the number of my fellow film school classmates that didn’t seem to know much or even particularly like many movies. There’s nothing more beautiful to me than a compelling story told through the lens of a gifted director with artful cinematography. It’s one of life’s truly greatest gifts. That being said, not everything has to be artful. Not everything has to be thought-provoking. Not everything has to even be tasteful. Sure, I love Fellini and Jodorowsky and Orson Welles but you know what? I also love Hot Tub Time Machine. I also love fucking Crocodile Dundee. I watched a new Adam Sandler movie LAST WEEK and had a blast with it. Sometimes I just need something completely mindless and entertaining for its own sake. And nothing can scratch that itch faster for me than a gratuitously violent action film. So today, I’m going to talk about Walter Hill’s 1996 gangster-noir-western Last Man Standing.
            This delightful little gun-fest is set in Prohibition-era Texas. The script is loosely based on the Akira Kurosawa samurai classic Yojimbo. If you’ve seen Kurosawa’s original, it’s easy to pick out some of the outline points but this film is, in true Walter Hill fashion, uniquely its own beast. Bruce Willis stars in the “man with no name” role as a fugitive who wanders into the small dirtball town of Jericho to find that two rival bootlegging gangs (one Irish, one Italian) have each set up their own operations in town. The gangs have an unspoken truce in place when Willis’ character, calling himself “John Smith,” arrives. Smith, seeing an opportunity for profit, immediately starts stirring up shit between the two gangs, offering himself up as a gun-for-hire to the highest bidder. After proving himself worthy by taking out a lieutenant from the Irish gang, he is quickly hired by the Italian gang, led by NYC mob boss Fredo Strozzi (Ned Eisenberg). After working for the Italians just long enough to learn their secrets, Smith then defects to the Irish gang, led by the cartoonish Mr. Doyle (David Patrick Kelly). Pitting the two gangs against each other and forcing a gang war, Smith continues to betray the trust of each of his former employers until everyone wants him dead. Except it's Bruce Willis, and the film is called Last Man Standing, so guess what….
            At the heart of it, it would seem like any other Bruce Willis action film. But hear me out here, because there is far more to this film, and in particular Bruce Willis’ Smith character, than meets the eye. Smith is not like other Bruce Willis action hero characters, like your Hudson Hawks and your John McClains. Smith is not a hero. He is not even a good guy. In fact, he might be the worst guy in Jericho which seems to be, with the exception of a spineless and corrupt sheriff (Bruce Dern), a mild-mannered innkeeper (William Sanderson) and a perpetually-grinning undertaker, a town made up entirely of criminals. Smith waltzes into town armed with two handguns and zero plans, and over a matter of days takes out hundreds of criminal gang members, never once missing and never taking a bullet himself. Smith is the main character and has the least amount of dialogue, barely saying ten words throughout the entire film (except when narrating). This monosyllabism adds to the sociopathy of his character, who seemingly enjoys just toying with these gang members just for the sake of it. Well, the sake of it and the money of it. The only time he shows any sign of a conscience is when he uses the money he’s made off the chaos between the gangs to pay the mistresses of both gang bosses so they can get out of town and start new lives. But even then he doesn’t show any romantic interest in either of them, and admittedly leaves Jericho with less money than he came in with. So perhaps he really did just disrupt everyone’s businesses and lives simply because he knew he could, which makes this character far more fascinating than just an average macho gunslinger. Less a dick-measuring contest and more a lesson in psychology. Also, you get to see Chris Walken play one of the most terrifying characters of his career, so that’s a plus.
            Anyway, if you judge this film based on most of the reviews online or its reception at the box office, then you’re really not giving it the credit it deserves. It’s an extremely underrated gem from a director who himself doesn’t get the credit he deserves. Whether you agree with that or not, at the very least watch it for the rad gunfights.
-         Jonathan Eagle